Re: pg_dump sort order for functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Date: 2010-01-11 16:57:49
Message-ID: 1263229069.26354.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2010-01-11 at 10:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > pg_dump sorts its output first by object type, then by object name, and
> > then processes all that for dependencies. This works well, but for
> > overloaded functions this still gives a random sort order that can
> > produce annoying diffs in the dump.
>
> > Would it be acceptable to introduce a secondary sort key field into the
> > DumpableObject struct that functions would fill with, say, the argument
> > types (maybe something like "text,int,int" -- need to play with this a
> > little)?
>
> I think you could probably use the existing tag field; no need for a new
> one.

Sorry, which tag field are you referring to?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-01-11 17:42:08 Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-11 15:44:52 Re: pg_dump sort order for functions