On fre, 2010-01-08 at 10:02 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Now, I'll second Greg Smith and Tom here, in that I think we need to
> the last commitfest as usual, knowing that the outcome of the
> for any given patch is not "it made it" but "we reviewed it". It's
> right for the project to bump a patch on resources ground rather than
> technical merit, at the end of the commitfest.
+1, leave everything as is.
The commitfest is a tool for people to track what is going on, not a
tool to tell people what to do.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-09 01:01:35|
|Subject: We need to rethink relation cache entry rebuild|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-01-08 23:58:27|
|Subject: Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction|