On fre, 2010-01-08 at 10:02 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Now, I'll second Greg Smith and Tom here, in that I think we need to
> run
> the last commitfest as usual, knowing that the outcome of the
> commitfest
> for any given patch is not "it made it" but "we reviewed it". It's
> still
> right for the project to bump a patch on resources ground rather than
> on
> technical merit, at the end of the commitfest.
+1, leave everything as is.
The commitfest is a tool for people to track what is going on, not a
tool to tell people what to do.
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2010-01-09 01:01:35 |
| Subject: We need to rethink relation cache entry rebuild |
| Previous: | From: Andrew Dunstan | Date: 2010-01-08 23:58:27 |
| Subject: Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction |