Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: damage control mode

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-09 00:48:41
Message-ID: 1262998121.20530.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2010-01-08 at 10:02 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Now, I'll second Greg Smith and Tom here, in that I think we need to
> run
> the last commitfest as usual, knowing that the outcome of the
> commitfest
> for any given patch is not "it made it" but "we reviewed it". It's
> still
> right for the project to bump a patch on resources ground rather than
> on
> technical merit, at the end of the commitfest. 

+1, leave everything as is.

The commitfest is a tool for people to track what is going on, not a
tool to tell people what to do.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-09 01:01:35
Subject: We need to rethink relation cache entry rebuild
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-01-08 23:58:27
Subject: Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group