| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq naming on Win64 |
| Date: | 2010-01-05 19:21:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1262719276.6448.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2010-01-05 at 16:48 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I would have thought Microsoft would have a better solution than this
> > for managing 64-bit libraries. Or am I too optimistic about Redmond's
> > competence?
>
> They have two separate installation directories for 32 and 64 bit
> packages. With PostgreSQL though, we'll quite possibly be shipping
> both 32 and 64 bit components in the same installer, and thus going
> into the same installation directory.
Can't the installer install things into two separate directories?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-01-05 19:23:15 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Get rid of the need for manual maintenance of the initial |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-05 19:19:38 | Re: Proposal: XML helper functions |