Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Block-level CRC checks

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date: 2009-12-01 12:38:37
Message-ID: 1259671117.13774.13028.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 07:05 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I assume torn pages are 99% of the reported problem, which are
> expected and are fixed, and bad hardware 1%, quite the opposite of your
> numbers above.

On what basis do you make that assumption?

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-12-01 12:42:10
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-12-01 12:08:21
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group