Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Daniel Farina <drfarina(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <dfarina(at)truviso(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION
Date: 2009-11-30 03:01:59
Message-ID: 1259550119.3355.45.camel@jdavis (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 18:53 -0800, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> > What if the network buffer is flushed in the middle of a line? Is that
> > possible, or is there a guard against that somewhere?
> 
> What do you mean?  They both catenate onto one stream of bytes, it
> shouldn't matter where the flush boundaries are...

Nevermind, for some reason I thought you were talking about interleaving
the data rather than concatenating.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2009-11-30 03:18:22
Subject: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
Previous:From: Itagaki TakahiroDate: 2009-11-30 02:57:11
Subject: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group