Re: Partitioning option for COPY

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioning option for COPY
Date: 2009-11-23 17:39:16
Message-ID: 1258997956.27757.6481.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:23 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:

> What would probably be helpful here is to take the mess of raw data
> above and turn it into a simpler partitioning roadmap.

Thanks for summarising.

I briefly tried to do that on the thread for Itagaki-san's patch. That's
a first stab at things, at least.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2009-11-23 17:44:01 KNNGiST for knn-search
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-11-23 17:23:21 Re: Partitioning option for COPY