Re: New mug design

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New mug design
Date: 2009-11-17 07:08:31
Message-ID: 1258441711.10724.16.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On mån, 2009-11-16 at 23:10 +0100, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:54:58 -0500 Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > On Monday 16 November 2009 12:20:26 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >
> > > How about:
> > >
> > > COMMIT;
> > >
> >
> > I think for most of us "BEGIN" would be more appropriate. :-)
>
> Both are fine for me - but in addition there should be the PG logo.
> Else the mug is "valid" for all sql databases and is not really unique
> for PostgreSQL.

If you create a geek mug, only geeks will buy and use it. The current
set of merchandise (e.g., mugs, pens, stress balls) is very family
friendly. The more gibberish you put on it, the less useful they will
become. ("Peter, why does it say COMMIT; next to the cute elephant?" --
"Oh, just use a different cup.")

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Napier 2009-11-17 11:52:13 Re: New mug design
Previous Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2009-11-16 22:10:17 Re: New mug design