Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg
Date: 2009-11-16 04:56:54
Message-ID: 1258347414.3581.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
On sön, 2009-11-15 at 17:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:09:14AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>> /home/peter/commit-msg
> >> er, what?
> > I'm suspecting a misfired script somewhere.
> 
> No doubt "cvs commit -m ~/commit-msg" instead of "cvs commit -F ~/commit-msg"
> ... I think I've made that mistake too.
> 
> For the sake of the archives: it was the previously proposed fix for
> bug #5075, see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-11/msg00131.php

Yeah, sorry guys.  I fixed the CVS log message now.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew GierthDate: 2009-11-16 05:04:50
Subject: Re: Aggregate ORDER BY patch
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2009-11-16 04:51:28
Subject: Re: named parameters in SQL functions

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2009-11-16 07:29:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-11-15 22:09:55
Subject: Re: pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group