| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Jantzen <djantzen(at)ql2(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Reversing flow of WAL shipping |
| Date: | 2009-10-22 16:42:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1256229769.3378.6.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> >
> > Here's the question: when I turn Server B into the
> > production/provider
> > node, it's going to switch into the next timeline. If I then
> > attempt
> > to put Server A (or Server C) into recovery mode, will it switch to
> >
> > the new current timeline, or complain about being in the older
> > timeline? Do I have to take another full backup of Server B after
> > it's become the production/provider node?
You will need to do a new base backup.
Joshua D. Drake
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> >
>
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Jantzen | 2009-10-22 17:28:19 | Re: Fwd: Reversing flow of WAL shipping |
| Previous Message | David Jantzen | 2009-10-22 16:34:42 | Fwd: Reversing flow of WAL shipping |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A.Bhattacharya | 2009-10-22 16:45:01 | Problem calling C function in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | David Jantzen | 2009-10-22 16:34:42 | Fwd: Reversing flow of WAL shipping |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Munro | 2009-10-22 16:47:16 | Re: Using views for row-level access control is leaky |
| Previous Message | João Eugenio Marynowski | 2009-10-22 16:35:21 | table corrupted |