Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: confusing archive_command example

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example
Date: 2010-04-01 00:03:03
Message-ID: 1251.1270080183@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> His complaint was that .../%f looks like ../%f;  is that a valid
> concern?

Well, it does look like it, I'm just not seeing an easy fix that makes
that better.  I think the original suggestion was to turn it into a
concrete example by writing something like /mnt/archive/%f.

> I have reverted the change.  Also, should we be using test !
> -e instead of -f?

No opinion.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2010-04-01 00:09:04
Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-03-31 23:51:14
Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group