Re: Bug in Create sequence parsing?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: postgres <postgres(at)euclid(dot)ihug(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in Create sequence parsing?
Date: 2000-06-01 02:19:01
Message-ID: 12506.959825941@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Seems we don't support int8 sequences. Should we? I don't see a good
> use for them.

Sooner or later we'll probably want to offer an option to make OID be
8 bytes. I could see switching sequences to int8 as well when we
do that. Of course it would not work on platforms without compiler
support for 64-bit integers...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message guenther mair 2000-06-01 12:49:02 double dumps for all objects with pg_dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-01 02:13:07 Re: uniqueness not always correct