Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing
Date: 2006-11-05 21:44:43
Message-ID: 12490.1162763083@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 14:47 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> That way it's unambiguous which is which. Ie, that it's minimum and maximum
>> age and not minimum and maximum transaction id which would be the other way
>> around.

> Sounds logical. Hadn't seen that you could take it both ways.

Agreed --- I've adopted Greg's suggestion.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-11-05 22:03:48
Subject: Re: Writing WAL for relcache invalidation:pg_internal.init
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-11-05 21:39:25
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-11-05 22:03:48
Subject: Re: Writing WAL for relcache invalidation:pg_internal.init
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-11-05 21:39:25
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group