Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date: 2009-07-27 23:18:12
Message-ID: 1248736692.18098.92.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (thinks...) Actually, u for unique might be a poor choice if Jeff's
> patch goes in and starts using it for things that aren't exactly
> unique indexes. Should it be just conindid?

My thoughts exactly.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-07-28 00:14:23 Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-07-27 23:14:01 Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications