Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date: 2009-07-27 23:18:12
Message-ID: 1248736692.18098.92.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (thinks...)  Actually, u for unique might be a poor choice if Jeff's
> patch goes in and starts using it for things that aren't exactly
> unique indexes.  Should it be just conindid?

My thoughts exactly.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2009-07-28 00:14:23
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Previous:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2009-07-27 23:14:01
Subject: Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group