Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date: 2009-07-27 20:45:15
Message-ID: 1248727515.18098.88.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> If we did add another column to pg_trigger, I'd be a bit tempted to add
> one to pg_constraint too.  tgconstrrelid for RI triggers is a mirror of
> a pg_constraint column, and it seems like the index data perhaps should
> be as well.  (Indeed, one of the thing that got me annoyed about this
> kluge in the first place was that it broke that relationship without
> changing the documentation.)

That would work great for me, as I was planning to add such a column
anyway for my "generalized index constraints" patch.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dean RasheedDate: 2009-07-27 20:54:39
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-07-27 20:33:47
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group