Re: Status of binary protocol usage?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: aaime74 <andrea(dot)aime(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
Date: 2007-06-25 04:15:59
Message-ID: 12468.1182744959@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

aaime74 <andrea(dot)aime(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hum, interesting. What would be the boatload of disadvantages?

Portability and cross-machine compatibility, or lack of same.

It's tough enough trying to make things work for relatively primitive
datatypes like float. I can hardly imagine that anyone would want to
support binary representations across platforms for geometric types.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Csaba Nagy 2007-06-25 10:47:29 Prepared statements, parameters and logging
Previous Message Russell Francis 2007-06-24 16:52:04 Patch to improve Cloneable implementation on classes which extend PGobject.