Tom Lane píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 13:13 -0400:
> I wrote:
> > Yes. What I was thinking of doing was committing a configure change to
> > reject flex < 2.5.31, and waiting to see how much of the buildfarm goes
> > red.
> Actually, most of the buildfarm members show which flex version they are
> running in the configure output. A quick look shows that of the 45
> members that have reported on HEAD in the past 2 days, 22 are running
> 2.5.4, which is a lot higher than I was expecting. Most of these are
> the Solaris boxen, which I imagine can be updated fairly painlessly
> since there are some of them that are already running something newer.
I hope, need to check/compile, but I don't expect any problems.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-07-02 19:35:13|
|Subject: Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation |
|Previous:||From: Zdenek Kotala||Date: 2009-07-02 19:28:56|
|Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5|