On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 21:04 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > Given that there is also a lot of work on synchronous replication, is
> > it better to get the HS in so the SR stuff can use that as a baseline,
> > or to triage in both patches together?
> Whichever finishes first. Although they're very useful together, there
> is little if any code-level dependency between them. It would be
> dangerous to have one wait for the other, as one or the other could well
> be delayed for some reason. We can't even be sure that both are finished
> in time for 8.5.
Code dependency is not the main worry. Developer and committer time and
attention is our scarcest resource and I expect it to remain so.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2009-07-01 09:20:41|
|Subject: Re: Extensions User Design|
|Previous:||From: Damon Xu||Date: 2009-07-01 07:44:26|
|Subject: Questions regarding PostgreSQL warm backup.|