Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.5 development schedule

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Date: 2009-07-01 07:58:06
Message-ID: 1246435086.27964.217.camel@dn-x300-willij (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 21:04 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > Given that there is also a lot of work on synchronous replication, is
> > it better to get the HS in so the SR stuff can use that as a baseline,
> > or to triage in both patches together?
> 
> Whichever finishes first. Although they're very useful together, there
> is little if any code-level dependency between them. It would be
> dangerous to have one wait for the other, as one or the other could well
> be delayed for some reason. We can't even be sure that both are finished
> in time for 8.5.

Code dependency is not the main worry. Developer and committer time and
attention is our scarcest resource and I expect it to remain so.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2009-07-01 09:20:41
Subject: Re: Extensions User Design
Previous:From: Damon XuDate: 2009-07-01 07:44:26
Subject: Questions regarding PostgreSQL warm backup.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group