On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> On the other point: are we going to eliminate mdunlink's isRedo
> parameter? Maybe the better thing is to have its callers pass the value
> of InArchiveRecovery?
We have one caller that is using a parameter incorrectly. It seems we
should correct the caller rather than change the API and potentially
effect all callers.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-06-25 19:03:22|
|Subject: Re: BUG #4879: bgwriter fails to fsync the file in recovery mode |
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-06-25 18:59:56|
|Subject: Re: BUG #4879: bgwriter fails to fsync the file in recovery