Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Date: 2009-06-18 21:36:19
Message-ID: 1245360979.23636.2.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
> > Agreed.  The core problem is that moderators have to dig through tons of
> > spam/duplicates/cross-posting to do anything meaningful, and they are
> > resigning under that load.  Address that core issue;  shaming is not
> > going to help anyone.
> 
> There is zero spam - we're not talking about list moderation.

I think a decision like this should be left to the moderators. I don't
mind the report.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> /D
> 
> -- 
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2009-06-19 17:23:08
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18
Previous:From: Guido BarosioDate: 2009-06-18 21:09:39
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group