Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby
Date: 2009-05-29 19:45:31
Message-ID: 1243626331.31613.83.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 21:46 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Regrettably, the patch doesn't remove the problem it was supposed to
> > remove and I'm highlighting there is still risk of data loss. 
> 
> I feel that you're moving the goalposts. What exactly is the problem it 
> was supposed to remove in your opinion?

I feel that you wish to argue this endlessly so that my point is lost
and the threat of data loss that was left exposed is forgotten.

I'm happy that I understand those threats and will advise my clients
accordingly. I've tried to help the community, but in the end, there is
a point where I stop trying to do so. Now, in fact.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-05-29 20:37:47
Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2009-05-29 19:41:38
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group