On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 21:46 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Regrettably, the patch doesn't remove the problem it was supposed to
> > remove and I'm highlighting there is still risk of data loss.
> I feel that you're moving the goalposts. What exactly is the problem it
> was supposed to remove in your opinion?
I feel that you wish to argue this endlessly so that my point is lost
and the threat of data loss that was left exposed is forgotten.
I'm happy that I understand those threats and will advise my clients
accordingly. I've tried to help the community, but in the end, there is
a point where I stop trying to do so. Now, in fact.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2009-05-29 20:37:47|
|Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2009-05-29 19:41:38|
|Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions|