Tom Lane píše v čt 23. 04. 2009 v 11:11 -0400:
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> > I hit a problem with libtcl.so that LDFLAGS is not propagated. The same
> > problem is with other PL languages as well.
> > Is it intention or a bug?
> It's intentional; LDFLAGS is for linking executables and may not be
> suitable for shlibs. I see that Makefile.shlib makes exceptions for
> some platforms though. What *specific* problem are you having, on what
I have problem with setup builfarm member on Solaris 10. I need to pass
-R<path> (rpath). I can do it by LD_OPTIONS as we do it for package
building. I had only doubt if it is correct behavior.
however it seems to me that $rpath should be set like --with-libs, but
it look likes that it does not work.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Zdenek Kotala||Date: 2009-04-23 15:35:07|
|Subject: Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS|
|Previous:||From: Bill Moran||Date: 2009-04-23 15:23:20|
|Subject: Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields|