| From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS |
| Date: | 2009-04-23 15:32:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1240500739.1275.55.camel@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane píše v čt 23. 04. 2009 v 11:11 -0400:
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> > I hit a problem with libtcl.so that LDFLAGS is not propagated. The same
> > problem is with other PL languages as well.
>
> > Is it intention or a bug?
>
> It's intentional; LDFLAGS is for linking executables and may not be
> suitable for shlibs. I see that Makefile.shlib makes exceptions for
> some platforms though. What *specific* problem are you having, on what
> platform?
I have problem with setup builfarm member on Solaris 10. I need to pass
-R<path> (rpath). I can do it by LD_OPTIONS as we do it for package
building. I had only doubt if it is correct behavior.
however it seems to me that $rpath should be set like --with-libs, but
it look likes that it does not work.
Thanks Zdenek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2009-04-23 15:35:07 | Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2009-04-23 15:23:20 | Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields |