On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> There is no need for any such infrastructure if we just drive it off a
>  post-ANALYZE callback.

That sounds reasonable, although it does seem a little strange for
analyze to actually perform cleanup.

Now that we have FSM, the cost of VACUUMing insert-only tables is a lot
less. Does that possibly justify running VACUUM on insert-only tables?
On tables without GIN indexes, that wouldn't be a complete waste,
because it could set hint bits, which needs to be done sometime anyway.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis

In response to

• Re: GIN fast-insert vs autovacuum scheduling at 2009-03-23 19:23:24 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: GIN fast-insert vs autovacuum scheduling at 2009-03-23 23:38:34 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2009-03-23 23:10:32
	Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Previous:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2009-03-23 22:34:12
	Subject: Re: hstore improvements?