Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot standby, recovery procs

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery procs
Date: 2009-02-26 10:32:49
Message-ID: 1235644369.16176.480.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 12:19 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 11:36 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > 
> >>> You haven't even given a good reason to make these changes.
> >> Simplicity.
> > 
> > You used that argument in January to explain why the coupling should be
> > reduced and now the same argument to put it back again.
> 
> That was in reference to the slot ids, I'm not suggesting to put that 
> back. If anything, removing the need for the the xl_topxid field in WAL 
> record will further reduce the coupling between master and standby.

OK, well, if you feel those changes are necessary prior to commit then I
would ask you do that in your public repo and we'll test and provide
helpful comments on it from there as quickly as we can. Too many cooks
spoil the git.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-02-26 13:22:52
Subject: Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-02-26 10:19:41
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery procs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group