On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:17 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 22:56 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> Since it's going to take us two weeks to clean up the other loose ends
> >>> anyway, there's no harm in letting Simon and Heikki try to complete the
> >>> patch by then. But I'll happily lay a side bet with you about what the
> >>> situation will be two weeks from now.
> >> I think Tom wins this bet, since it's now been four weeks. In fact,
> >> he was being optimistic: the loose ends aren't cleaned up either
> >> (based on a review of the wiki, we're about half way there: six
> >> patches have been committed in the intervening time and seven remain
> >> in the queue).
> > I agree. It is time to move on.
> Huh? What features are you saying about to be moved on?
> Is it the updatable-view feature? or rest of all pending ones?
Tom originally stated (as I recall, no flames please) that we would wait
for 2 weeks for the hot standby stuff. It has now been four. That is
what I and I believe Robert Haas are talking about.
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2009-02-26 05:43:06|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql:
Automatic view update rules)|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-02-26 05:18:47|
|Subject: Re: xpath processing brain dead |