Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Date: 2009-02-24 18:48:42
Message-ID: 1235501322.16176.187.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:34 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Well VLDB is like 2% of what we need. 

I am against removing an existing capability that is important to some
users. We shouldn't need to debate the exact percentage of users that
would be affected, or how to count them.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-02-24 18:51:58
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-02-24 18:34:15
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group