On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:51 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:47 PM, K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
> <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com> wrote:
> > Could you please let me know what are the outstanding features that are still to be developed in the respective patches?
> > I'am currently referring the wiki: "Todo and Claim" for NTT and for HotStandby, i see that almost all issues are closed. Are there any features / refactoring / bugs still need to be fixed.
> At least I'm planning to work on the following two items of Synch Rep for v8.5.
> Of course, Synch Rep works fine without these features.
> - Add new feature which transfers all WAL records via the direct connection
> between the primary and the standby. In other words, get rid of
> file-based log shipping part from the patch.
Please bear in mind my strong objection to this. Attempting to transfer
all data via a single connection destroys VLDB usage of this feature. So
for me its just additional code for ease-of-use in the simplest case,
not code replacement.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-02-24 17:37:59|
|Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2009-02-24 16:46:24|
|Subject: Re: Sync replication tests|