Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date: 2009-06-29 14:52:59
Message-ID: 12342.1246287179@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Monday 29 June 2009 17:20:09 Tom Lane wrote:
>> If it were
>> actually possible to support Win64 with only a couple of dozen lines
>> of changes, we would have done it long since.

> Possibly, or everyone was too confused and didn't know where to start.

Well, the previous proposal involved a massively invasive patch IIRC,
so I'm suspicious of this one being so short...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: m_listsDate: 2009-06-29 15:15:16
Subject: Re: Query progress indication - an implementation
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-06-29 14:40:08
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group