Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Monday 29 June 2009 17:20:09 Tom Lane wrote:
>> If it were
>> actually possible to support Win64 with only a couple of dozen lines
>> of changes, we would have done it long since.
> Possibly, or everyone was too confused and didn't know where to start.
Well, the previous proposal involved a massively invasive patch IIRC,
so I'm suspicious of this one being so short...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: m_lists||Date: 2009-06-29 15:15:16|
|Subject: Re: Query progress indication - an implementation|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-06-29 14:40:08|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms|