Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-29 18:48:47
Message-ID: 1233254927.30906.9.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 13:16 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?

The one that has always bothered me is that there's no way to explicitly
set the value that is returned by PQcmdTuples(), i.e. the number of
affected rows.

This makes it very difficult to make truly transparent updatable views
in a complex case, e.g., if you're updating a remote table or something.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis


In response to

  • Pet Peeves? at 2009-01-29 13:16:17 from Gregory Stark

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tommy GildsethDate: 2009-01-29 18:53:07
Subject: Re: Text search segmentation fault
Previous:From: johnfDate: 2009-01-29 18:42:01
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group