Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby (v9d)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby (v9d)
Date: 2009-01-24 11:20:32
Message-ID: 1232796032.2327.1395.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 17:24 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:

> > version 9g - please use this for testing now

> I'm doing some test runs with this now. I notice an old flatfiles 
> related bug has reappeared:

I'm seeing an off-by-one error on xmax, in some cases. That then causes
the flat file update to not pick up correct info, even though it
executed in other ways as intended. If you run two create databases and
then test only the first, it appears to have worked as intended.

These bugs are result of recent refactoring and it will take a few days
to shake some of them out. We've had more than 20 already so we're
beating them back, but we're not done yet. 

Thanks for the report, will publish this and other fixes on Monday.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2009-01-24 11:35:44
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reloptions - RELOPT_KIND_ALL
Previous:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2009-01-24 11:18:57
Subject: Re: foreign_data test fails with non-C locale

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group