On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 12:21 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> Simon Riggs [2009-01-05 10:57 +0000]:
> > Is this 11 per minute, or 11 per second?
> Per second.
Seems consistent with wal_writer_delay = 200ms and bgwriter_delay =
200ms, plus some other minor noise.
So its not a "bug" and won't get "fixed".
Seems possible to put some progressive delays in there, but we'd need to
discuss how things could snap back into action when required.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: val||Date: 2009-01-05 12:37:22|
|Subject: PANIC: failed to re-find parent key in "100924" for split pages 1606/1673|
|Previous:||From: Martin Pitt||Date: 2009-01-05 11:21:19|
|Subject: Re: Bug#506196: Debian Bug#506196: postgresql: consume toomuch power when idle (>10 wakeups/second)|