Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
Date: 2008-12-09 15:58:28
Message-ID: 1228838308.13962.0.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:10 +0100, Mario Weilguni wrote:
> Scott Marlowe schrieb:
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> wrote:

> I still think we must be doing something wrong here, I googled the 
> controller and Linux, and did not find anything indicating a problem. 
> The HP SmartArray series is quite common, so a lot of users would have 
> the same problem.

Yes the SmartArray series is quite common and actually know to perform
reasonably well, in RAID 10. You still appear to be trying RAID 5.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Thanks!
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Gabriele TurchiDate: 2008-12-09 16:03:48
Subject: Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-12-09 15:30:38
Subject: Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group