Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Date: 2008-11-26 22:12:42
Message-ID: 1227737562.9359.230.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:06 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> > Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port
> > 22 and force key based auth only.
> 
> How does that work?  Does that kill the script kiddies in their tracks?  I'm 
> guessing so, but had never thought to try it ...
> 

Well they can still talk to the port of course but its irrelevant
because unless they have an ssh key, they aren't getting in. Period.


> How would someone upload their key if they don't have access?  Some sort of web 
> interface?  One wouldn't want to throw extra admin overhead if it can be 
> avoided ...
> 

See other comment on this.

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
PostgreSQL
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2008-11-26 22:14:19
Subject: Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-11-26 22:11:50
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group