Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Edwin Martin <e(dot)j(dot)martin(at)chello(dot)nl>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
Date: 2001-01-24 15:29:34
Message-ID: 12274.980350174@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-docs
[Sorry, didn't see the rest of this thread right away]

Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
> I turned the index page into a redirect so that should take care of the
> problem with the exception of pages in the stale docs that are bookmarked.

I'd vote for physically removing the old docs.  I'd rather people find
that their bookmark links are broken than that they continue to see
obsolete/incorrect docs ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Vince VielhaberDate: 2001-01-24 15:47:28
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-01-24 15:26:29
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Vince VielhaberDate: 2001-01-24 15:47:28
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-01-24 15:26:29
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group