Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Jesse Morris <jmorris(at)coverity(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"
Date: 2009-11-16 21:39:15
Message-ID: 12222.1258407555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Which leads to the question - do we want to back out the
>> patch, have 8.2 keep working on that, and having 8.2 fail in the few
>> unusual scenarios we have now, or do we also backpatch the requirement
>> to run on win2k or later?

> I think the safest course is to revert the fix and keep 8.2 working on
> all platforms on which it used to work.

+1 --- since this seems to be a corner case, desupporting old Windows
versions in a minor update doesn't seem like the thing to do.

Sorry for creating work for you, Magnus.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas S. Chin 2009-11-16 22:12:39 Re: BUG #5192: --disable-integer-datetimes changes timestamp comparison behavior
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-11-16 21:20:16 Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joachim Wieland 2009-11-16 21:41:51 Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-16 21:33:21 Re: New VACUUM FULL