| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Naz <lists(at)mrnaz(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Binaries vs Source |
| Date: | 2008-09-23 17:52:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1222192358.3527.73.camel@laptop.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 20:52 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>
> OTOH, if you install from sources you can install patches as soon as
> they are committed... then you can always have your installation at
> the most recent minor version... and of course more protected from
> bugs.
Heh :) So you assume that the patches are well-tested before committing,
and they have no bugs?
...also what you wrote can be done easily with the binary packages.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-09-24 14:02:36 | Re: Binaries vs Source |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-09-23 01:52:27 | Re: Binaries vs Source |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-09-23 18:08:58 | Bad link for win32/latest |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-09-23 01:52:27 | Re: Binaries vs Source |