Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: hash index improving v3

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Xiao Meng <mx(dot)cogito(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hash index improving v3
Date: 2008-09-23 13:27:02
Message-ID: 1222176422.4445.354.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> The other side of that coin is that it's not clear this is really worth
> arguing about, much less exposing a separate parameter for.

Agreed.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-09-23 13:27:22
Subject: Re: WIP patch: Collation support
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-09-23 13:26:11
Subject: Re: Planner question

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-09-23 13:34:39
Subject: Re: hash index improving v3
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-09-23 13:13:14
Subject: Re: hash index improving v3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group