Re: why does this use the wrong index?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Rainer Mager <rainer(at)vanten(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why does this use the wrong index?
Date: 2008-09-19 18:25:28
Message-ID: 1221848728.6194.292.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> So, What can I do to encourage Postgres to use the first index even when the
> date range is smaller.
>

It looks like PostgreSQL is estimating the selectivity of your date
ranges poorly. In the second (bad) plan it estimates that the index scan
with the filter will return 1 row (and that's probably because it
estimates that the date range you specify will match only one row).

This leads PostgreSQL to choose the narrower index because, if the index
scan is only going to return one row anyway, it might as well scan the
smaller index.

What's the n_distinct for start_time?

=> select n_distinct from pg_stats where tablename='ad_log' and
attname='start_time';

If n_distinct is near -1, that would explain why it thinks that it will
only get one result.

Based on the difference between the good index scan (takes 0.056ms per
loop) and the bad index scan with the filter (311ms per loop), the
"player" condition must be very selective, but PostgreSQL doesn't care
because it already thinks that the date range is selective.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2008-09-19 18:43:24 Re: why does this use the wrong index?
Previous Message Mark Mielke 2008-09-19 16:22:51 Re: RAID arrays and performance