Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Uh, where are we on this?
Still in the think-about-it mode, personally ... my proposed fix is
certainly much too invasive to consider back-patching, so unless someone
comes up with a way-simpler idea, it's 8.3 material at best ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Peter Eisentraut | Date: 2007-02-01 07:42:47 |
| Subject: Re: "May", "can", "might" |
| Previous: | From: Bruce Momjian | Date: 2007-02-01 05:14:03 |
| Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Typo in pg_dump documentation and new
suggestion for Release Notes |
pgsql-patches by date
| Next: | From: Neil Conway | Date: 2007-02-01 06:40:40 |
| Subject: Re: [pgsql-patches] Patch to avoid gprofprofilingoverwrites |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2007-02-01 05:59:40 |
| Subject: Re: [pgsql-patches] Patch to avoid gprof profilingoverwrites |