Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>, Fred Yankowski <fred(at)ontosys(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
Date: 2001-04-04 21:04:40
Message-ID: 12181.986418280@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patchespgsql-ports
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> It seems we're now down to

> DLLLIBS= -lcygipc -lcrypt

> but I think it can be removed completely.

> We have three uses of this variable:

> 1) Makefile.win, for building extension modules.  No module in existance
> needs -lcygipc, and if one needs -lcrypt it can put it into SHLIB_LINK.

> 2) Makefile.shlib, see 1)

> 3) -lcrypt already comes in via LIBS (like all the other libraries),
> -lcygipc can do the same, or be hard-coded in place.


But you forgot about -lpostgres for the backend libraries (plpgsql etc).

I suppose that we might consider adding these libraries to LIBS not
DLLLIBS, but that's cleanup work that I'd rather not try to do under
time pressure (especially since I can't test it here).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-04-04 21:14:55
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-04-04 20:47:06
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-04-04 21:14:55
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-04-04 20:47:06
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group