| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
| Date: | 2008-07-25 14:03:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1216994580.16378.2.camel@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:37 +0300, Asko Oja wrote:
> Hi
>
> One of reasons to get PL/proxy into core is to make it available to
> Windows users also.
> The idea is to get to the situation
>
> createlang plproxy mydb
>
> If we can achieve this without putting plproxy into core then i would
> like to hear how.
If the installer project wants to use it on Windows they can. Of course
that assumes that it runs on windows (I have no idea if it does).
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-07-25 14:17:33 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-07-25 12:14:45 | Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. |