On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:40 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 07:56 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Simon,
> > * Simon Riggs (simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> > > > I hadn't realized that Simon was using "pre-schema" and "post-schema"
> > > > to name the first and third parts. I'd agree that this is confusing
> > > > nomenclature: it looks like it's trying to say that the data is the
> > > > schema, and the schema is not! How about "pre-data and "post-data"?
> > >
> > > OK by me. Any other takers?
> > Having the command-line options be "--schema-pre-data" and
> > "--schema-post-data" is fine with me. Leaving them the way they are is
> > also fine by me. It's the documentation (back to pg_dump.sgml,
> > ~774/~797) that starts talking about Pre-Schema and Post-Schema.
> OK, Mr.Reviewer, sir:
> * patch redone using --schema-before-data and --schema-after-data
> * docs rewritten using short clear descriptions using only the words
> "before" and "after", like in the option names
> * all variable names changed
> * retested
> So prefixes "pre" and "post" no longer appear anywhere. No latin derived
> phrases, just good ol' Anglo-Saxon words.
...and with command line help also.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Matthew T. O'Connor||Date: 2008-07-23 17:33:35|
|Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into
PG core distribution?|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2008-07-23 17:08:53|
|Subject: Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2008-07-23 18:38:56|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-07-23 16:40:37|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance|