Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert
Date: 2008-06-27 22:00:56
Message-ID: 12163.1214604056@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> In cases where we know we will assign a real xid, can we just skip the
> assignment of the virtual xid completely?

Even if we could do this I doubt it would be a good idea.  It'd destroy
the invariant that all transactions have a vxid, which at the very least
would create naming problems.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-27 22:08:06
Subject: Re: Table inheritance surprise
Previous:From: Jean-Michel PouréDate: 2008-06-27 21:54:17
Subject: XML index support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group