Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:13 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step > with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging. > > Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like > all the other logging functions? Patch enclosed. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
Attachment: log_temp_files_suset.v1.patch
Description: text/x-patch (924 bytes)
Description: text/x-patch (924 bytes)
In response to
- Userset logging at 2008-07-07 15:13:13 from Simon Riggs
Responses
- Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging at 2008-08-22 18:47:14 from Bruce Momjian
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Zdenek Kotala Date: 2008-07-08 08:22:32 Subject: Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Previous: From: Dave Page Date: 2008-07-08 07:26:42 Subject: Re: CommitFest rules
pgsql-patches by date
Next: From: Tatsuo Ishii Date: 2008-07-08 09:01:05 Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Previous: From: ITAGAKI Takahiro Date: 2008-07-08 01:29:04 Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements