Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging
Date: 2008-07-08 07:36:21
Message-ID: 1215502581.4051.674.camel@ebony.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:13 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step
> with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging.
> 
> Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like
> all the other logging functions?

Patch enclosed.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

Attachment: log_temp_files_suset.v1.patch
Description: text/x-patch (924 bytes)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2008-07-08 08:22:32
Subject: Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2008-07-08 07:26:42
Subject: Re: CommitFest rules

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2008-07-08 09:01:05
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP
Previous:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2008-07-08 01:29:04
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group