On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > In cases where we know we will assign a real xid, can we just skip the
> > assignment of the virtual xid completely?
> Even if we could do this I doubt it would be a good idea. It'd destroy
> the invariant that all transactions have a vxid, which at the very least
> would create naming problems.
Ahh, no, I meant go straight to assigning a real xid, to avoid the
wasted effort in inserting a vxid *and* a real xid.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-06-30 06:51:08|
|Subject: Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert|
|Previous:||From: Jamie Deppeler||Date: 2008-06-30 05:55:10|
|Subject: Postgresql 8.3 issue|