Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?)
Date: 2000-06-26 04:35:44
Message-ID: 12147.961994144@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> writes:
> I don't need help on this as I found workable queries for my purposes,
> but here is a simplified core-dumper (7.0beta3) for posterity...

This doesn't come close to doing anything as-is, but even reading
between the lines ("activity"=>"bar" etc) and deleting references
to missing fields, I can't get a crash. Possibly a bug fixed since
beta3?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-06-26 04:48:13 Re: [HACKERS] CLASSOID patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-26 04:16:53 Re: About the pid and opts files