Quick Links

Re: SQL: table function support

From:	Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To:	Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: SQL: table function support
Date:	2008-06-10 00:56:59
Message-ID:	1213059419.18659.37.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-patches

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:03 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> this patch add support of table functions syntax like ANSI SQL 2003.

I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but I wonder if we really need
*more* syntax variants for declaring set-returning functions. The
existing patchwork of features is confusing enough as it is...

-Neil

In response to

SQL: table function support at 2008-06-03 11:03:06 from Pavel Stehule

Responses

Re: SQL: table function support at 2008-06-10 02:01:24 from Tom Lane
Re: SQL: table function support at 2008-06-10 04:42:19 from Pavel Stehule
Re: SQL: table function support at 2008-06-12 15:43:28 from David Fetter

Browse pgsql-patches by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2008-06-10 01:43:34	Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL
Previous Message	Jan Urbański	2008-06-09 21:45:02	minor ts_type.h comment fix