Emil,
That would tend to make sense given the results I am seeing. I am/was
just paranoid that I've lost data - but everything says not an that its
just a blip in the sequencing.
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 12:50 +0200, Emil Obermayr wrote:
> Maybe its because the sequence gets a batch of IDs in the cache and
> discards it with a crash? So unused sequence-ID get lost, while the
> sequence is reset to the number of the last really used ID during a
> normal shutdown?
>
> Just a thought.