Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> btw, it *may* be premature to assume that your patches are completely
> accepted yet, since none of us are very focused on new features at this
> moment.
In fact the patch seemed quite incomplete to me; adding a new parsenode
type requires much more than just a struct declaration. But this isn't
the right time of the cycle to be reviewing new-feature patches.
BTW, patches should usually be sent to pgsql-patches not pgsql-hackers.
regards, tom lane