From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
Date: | 2007-12-07 06:21:10 |
Message-ID: | 12069.1197008470@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib modules
> was to e-mail the author. If people think that we've reached a standard
> that everything in /contrib is now well-documented and supported by the
> general community, the I suppose we don't need contact information. I'm
> not so sure myself.
I do not think that we should encourage people to mail the authors first
rather than pgsql-bugs. For one thing, a lot of those addresses are
dead, and some of the ones that aren't don't respond especially fast.
If the community-at-large can't handle a bug, we certainly have enough
institutional memory to try to contact the original author, even if that
address isn't in the SGML docs.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albert Cervera i Areny | 2007-12-07 07:51:59 | Re: "distributed checkpoint" |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-12-07 06:16:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albert Cervera i Areny | 2007-12-07 07:51:59 | Re: "distributed checkpoint" |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-12-07 06:16:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |