On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 16:19 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The other approach, of course, is to just keep all the code in tqual.c
> and not create a separate module at all. Opinions? I prefer to keep
> them separate, but I'm not wedded to it if there's any strong reason not
> to do it. Also, the line is currently blurred because some users of
> snapshots mess with the internals directly (setting snapshot->curcid),
> but we could clean that up and make it so that those become external
> interface users too.
Sounds like a good idea to me -- +1 on keeping the code in two separate
files, and moving snapshot users toward using the external interface.
Given that there's no functional change here, I don't see anything to
stop this patch being applied sooner rather than later...
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-03-25 22:48:04|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string |
|Previous:||From: Robert Lor||Date: 2008-03-25 20:45:32|
|Subject: Doc patch for DTrace|